Lars Gullik Bj�nnes wrote: > No, not really. I would be easy enough to set and rest the bv as a > member in the lyxtext.
What I say is to have only one bv for every lyxtext. So you want to do this lyxtext sharing because of the particular case in which the (say two) bv have exactly the same width? Also remember that the cursor & selection are members of LyXTexts, so we would need some work to take them out (or else they need also to be adjusted at every switch). > | > | Why is moving lyxtexts useful ? > | > > | > speed. > | > | Well I don't uderstand this but don't care enough to ask more > > switch between loaded buffers without the cache and you will need a > full rebreak of the buffer every time. so depending on hardware you > will have a 2-10 seconds delay. If you have a different lyxtexts for different bv you don't need a full rebreak when you switch. The only point that I see against one bv for every lyxtext is memory space in the specific case in which two bv have the same size. I think it doesn't worst it. Alfredo
