John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 09:03:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > | Sorry, why is this better than having a separate (fixed) lyxtext for every
| > | bv?
| >
| > Because when you change documents you have to rebreak... rebreaking is
| > expensive and takes time. that is why we have the textcache.
|
| Why do you have to rebreak ?
|
| BufferView1(buffer1) -> LyXText1
| BufferView2(buffer1) -> LyXText2
| BufferView3(buffer1) -> LyXText3
| BufferView4(buffer2) -> LyXText4
| BufferView5(buffer2) -> LyXText5
| Where is the rebreak on any switch here ??
eh?
when I want buffer3 shown in BufferView2.
and we do not have several BufferViews yet, so the current situation
would be:
BufferView1(buffer1) -> LyXText1
BufferView1(buffer2) -> LyXText2
BufferView1(buffer3) -> LyXText3
BufferView1(buffer1) -> LyXText1
If we didn't have the textcache then the LyXText would all be the
same, and a full rebreak would be needed on all switches.
--
Lgb
