Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> > Can you test now if there are no regressions? >> >> I have found one regression: LyX spellchecks ERTs > > Another thing: > In 1.3, f&r sets collapsables to their original state after leaving it > (e.g., if it finds a word in a collapsed footnote, the footnote will be > collapsed again after f&r has left it). > Now, after f&r (and spellchecking) all collapsables where something has > been found are left opened.
I don't see this behaviour with 1.3.2 spellchecking, only with s&r. It's also a bit unexpected, as the dialog is modeless: I.e., would make different the behaviour of a "find-next" from a first "find". What if the inset has been moved, or manually closed, or simply erased inbetween? In any case, this is a bit more dificult, I would have to think about it. Is it important? Alfredo
