Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> It's also a bit unexpected, as the dialog is modeless: I.e., would make >> different the behaviour of a "find-next" from a first "find". What if the >> inset has been moved, or manually closed, or simply erased inbetween? >> In any case, this is a bit more dificult, I would have to think about it. > > How did 1.3 s&r manage this?
To tell you the truth, no idea. I'll look at the code. >> Is it important? > > Important? Let's say I like the way s&r works in 1.3. I usually have lots > of footnotes in my docs and I usually keep them closed. So anything that > opens my footnotes keeps me from concentrating on my work, since I have to > "collapse" them out of my way. Of course this is way better now, but I'd > prefer a method that changes the document's state as less as possible. Ok, if it's a good feature, it's a good feature. I'll keep it in mind (there are several possible ways of implementing this.) > (Nevertheless your changes are a huge step forwards!) > JÃrgen. Thanks for your support. (and if you detect more regressions, please tell) Regards, Alfredo.
