Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > I don't see this behaviour with 1.3.2 spellchecking, only with s&r.
Yes. Sorry for not stating it clearer. For spellchecking, your changes are a big improvement (since the 1.3 spellchecker opened *any* footnote on his way through the document). > It's also a bit unexpected, as the dialog is modeless: I.e., would make > different the behaviour of a "find-next" from a first "find". What if the > inset has been moved, or manually closed, or simply erased inbetween? > In any case, this is a bit more dificult, I would have to think about it. How did 1.3 s&r manage this? > Is it important? Important? Let's say I like the way s&r works in 1.3. I usually have lots of footnotes in my docs and I usually keep them closed. So anything that opens my footnotes keeps me from concentrating on my work, since I have to "collapse" them out of my way. Of course this is way better now, but I'd prefer a method that changes the document's state as less as possible. (Nevertheless your changes are a huge step forwards!) J�rgen.
