Hello Gour, On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:15:07 +0200 Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karsten Heymann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > The more "natural" Toolkit for LyX would be FLTK I think, because it > > seems to be quite close to xforms. But that would have to be done as > > well... > > Why do you think it is more 'natural'? > > Since LyX is going into GUI-independence territory, can we say that > some toolkit is 'more natural'? <quote http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg60374.html> > Of course, if the xforms code were ported to FLTK, we could have two > identical frontends. Then there might be a case to argue. Would that make sense (i.e. shipping code with two near identical frontends)? I mean, do you want to include every frontend for which you have volunteers? As fltk is, as I understand it, more or less an improved xforms, I would not mind if fltk played the Darwin game with xforms (though xforms works well enough where I need it , i.e. on slow machines like my old notebook). </quote> But maybe I'm wrong here, since I'm no programmer (only latex and python, if that counts ;-) ) Karsten
