Gour wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> I'd say that a C++ toolkit is "more natural", other than that it >> really doesn't matter... > > One more point. Although I know that the choice of GUI toolkit is > evoking religious war,
I don't think so. The Qt frontend exists, so we support it. The gtk, wxWidgets, gnome, MSFC frontends do not, so we don't. If someone wants to write a frontend using these toolkits, then great, but I don't see any of the current team being motivated to help actively. > I'm just thinking that at the present moment there > are (maybe) separate endeavours for each port (are they?), while > wxWidgets can (in theory) provide port(s) for three platforms with > native widgets on each. The Qt toolkit is cross platform and the frontend works. We'll keep it working. It's up to you to decide whether you want to help port lyx to another toolkit. -- Angus
