On Monday, May 28, 2018 10:20:22 AM PDT Rich Shepard wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018, John White wrote: > > I gave lyx 2.3. a try from debian stretch backports and the results are > > the same, so I went back to 2.2.2 (for a while). > > John, > > Why not continue with 2.3.0? You're no better off with an earlier I am not sure docs written in 2.3 can be opened in 2.2.2 and my staff uses 2.2.2. When we are not so busy, I plan to update to latest lyx.
> version. > > What I am planning to do, if all else fails, is print the document, or > > parts of it, on blank pleading paper with numbers already printed down the > > left hand side. Lyx prints the indexes (table of contents, table of > > authorities, table of statutes, etc,) very well. > > Have you seen this solution > <https://latex.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22708>? Thank you. Lawlist's post is very good. It is what I use (see my original post on Pleading Paper / TOC. It well prints any document that does not have indexes. However, adding an index blows it up. > > I thought there were several lyx layouts for legal documents as the need > has been expressed on the maillist several times over the past couple of > decades. Probably some from me. Jurgen gave me some tips on indexing a couple of years back. > > Regards, > > Rich John
