On 3/26/20 10:31 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:50:53AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>>> Thank you for your responses. I can't say I fully understand why Lyx
>>> needs to be as it is; I'm generally against hard coded parameters.
>> We are as well, and I don't entirely know why it is done this way. It
>> could be worth raising on lyx-devel.
> Git points to 9b13535e778b9
> PDFOptions.cpp: add two hyperref options for better compatibility for 
> non-latin titles, etc.
>
> It might have been wrong to hardcode it this way, anyway we can't just drop it
> from compatibility reasons now. But adding new unicode option to the dialog 
> (by
> default on) seems correct solution.
> I don't have time to write the patch though.

I can find the time, probably.

Should we do something more general and allow custom options to be set?
I.e., output no options ourselves in that case?

Riki


-- 
lyx-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users

Reply via email to