> qt seems a good choice on windows (native widgets, no Cygwin layer + X
> server ).  Applications written in qt run very fine on windows. (and has
> all 'modern' features (docking windows, toolbars, MDI,
> subprocesses....)).

Qt itself did not look "modern" last time I've seen it. 
It rather looked like C++ from the stone age...

Andre'

-- 
Andr� P�nitz ............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to