> > qt seems a good choice on windows (native widgets, no Cygwin layer + X
> > server ). Applications written in qt run very fine on windows. (and has
> > all 'modern' features (docking windows, toolbars, MDI,
> > subprocesses....)).
>
> Qt itself did not look "modern" last time I've seen it.
> It rather looked like C++ from the stone age...
>
> Andre'
he means its feature set. it's a pity qt uese such a crippled c++, but that's offtopic
too
I suppose
john
>
--
"I have been a soreheaded occupant of a file drawer labeled 'Science Fiction' ...
and I would like out, particularly since so many serious critics regularly
mistake the drawer for a urinal."
- Kurt Vonnegut
