On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:00:34PM -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> I apologize if this has been reported, but my time is limited and I can't
> track all the messages which flow through this list... :) I'm now using
I hope this comment didn't bother people (I don't knpow how someone may
interpret it on retrospection). I have checked the archive and see nothing
obviously related to what I have found...
Some additional information: if I try the sequence below at the beginning
of a document, it flat out fails with 6 errors about things like missing }'s
and so on. Is there a way to log these errors (since I can't seem to copy
the text out of the boxes)?
Has the input for math changed that much from 1.2.x ? I have noticed that
C-m A-m m CH <rightarrow> _4
works OK. ????
Kenward
> 1.3.1 with my documents and have discovered that writing a chemical formula
> in my usaul fashion totally screws up paragraph formatting.
> For example, to create "CH4" with the 4 subscripted, I normally would type
> C-m A-m m CH_4
> and continue with the rest of the paragraph. The problem arises on the
> display of this paragraph. The moment the line with the CH4 is reached, the
> rest of the paragraph runs off the right side of the page.
>
> Additionally, I used to be able to write out an entire reaction equation by
> doing the following for something like CH4 + 2 O2 --> CO2 + 2 H2O
> C-m A-m m CHOCOHO
> followed by using the arrow keys to back up and place subscripts, spaces,
> arrows, etc, in their respective places. Doing this maintained the text
> appearance throughout without having to do the A-m m sequence for each
> letter (or set of contiguous letters). Now, that nicety is lost.
--
In a completely rational society, the best of us would aspire to be
_teachers_ and the rest of us would have to settle for something less,
because passing civilization along from one generation to the next
ought to be the highest honor and the highest responsibility anyone
could have. - Lee Iacocca