I know this is far from the subject of the vote, but any chance to implement the subequations environment into the layout? Or this is something that needs a deeper programing?
On Friday 21 September 2007 16:17, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm revising the amsart, amsart-plain, amsart-seq and amsbook layouts, > and there are a few oddities that need to be reconciled. Mostly I'm > making choices capriciously :-), but this is something I thought I would > put to a vote. > > The following numbered environments exist in all but amsart-plain: > > Theorem; Corollary; Lemma; Proposition; Conjecture; Criterion; > Algorithm; Axiom; Definition; Example; Condition; Problem; Exercise; > Remark; Note; Notation; Claim; Summary (yes it's numbered, don't ask me > why); Acknowledgement; Case; Conclusion; Fact; Assumption (I added that > last one). > > In the standard AMS layout, all these but one are numbered within > sections, consecutively using a single counter (so that, for instance, > if a lemma appears in section 3 after theorem 12, it's Lemma 3.13). The > oddball is Case, which is not numbered by section, and has its own > counter separate from the other items (so that if Lemma 3.13 is followed > by the second case overall, it's Case 2). > > I don't know why Case should be treated differently from everything > else, so in the absence of votes to the contrary I'll merge it into the > fold. Please let me know through the list and/or by direct e-mail if > you have strong preferences to the contrary. Also, this is your chance > to argue for different numbering of other environments (or different > labeling, different text style, whatever -- within reason). > > Cheers, > Paul -- Rudi Gaelzer Department of Physics Institute of Physics and Mathematics Federal University of Pelotas BRAZIL Registered Linux User # 153741
