On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 09:58:50PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In fact that's actually the most sensible behaviour since there are only > > very few cases where a new version indeed can replace an older one > > without any existing or imagined problem. > > What's wrong with static linking?
Not much. But it's not very different from per-application shared objects. In the 'main application' in my previous job most we actually linked most of the stuff statically - including Qt... > At least it goes away when the application goes away. That's a benefit. Andre'
