On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Liviu Andronic <landronim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes <rob.oa...@oak-tree.us> wrote: >> very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only docx >> support) would also be very helpful. >> > If .docx-only support simplifies your task and helps ensure that your > tool would support a good deal of functionality, then I'm all for it. > Support for .doc can be worked around, not least by resaving the > document in LibreOffice. >
Absolutely. Go for docx. Converting between .doc and .docx is relatively painless. Stefano -- __________________________________________________ Stefano Franchi Associate Research Professor Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125 Texas A&M University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421 College Station, Texas, USA stef...@tamu.edu http://stefano.cleinias.org
