I've been thinking about writing a little modem emulator that could let you do 
ssh / telnet from any retro computer by issuing a dial command. Something like 
that could run on the raspberry pi.



> On May 20, 2015, at 10:47 AM, David Flippo <flipd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Being new to this forum, I'll add my 1.5 cents to the TDock discussion. It 
> seems, the most straight forward approach, both hardware, and software, would 
> be a serial to USB interface to a Raspi; the Raspi being the emulator. The 
> Raspi would offer all of the hardware add-ons WiFi, HDMI/ Composite display, 
> SD, etc capability. The 100/102/200, would need a simple serial interface 
> program, developed to communicate through the serial interface, to the Raspi. 
> In effect the 100/102/200, is acting as a dump terminal. The software for the 
> Raspi emulator would, or might be the only software challenge. This approach 
> would provide a more simple portability interface, both hardware wise, and 
> wouldn't be limited to physical portability also.
> 
> Dave
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On May 20, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Ken Pettit <petti...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey Mike,
>> 
>> I suppose you could use serial port + Bluetooth to drive an 80x25 character 
>> display.  But I wonder how slow it would be to do scrolling, etc.  I was 
>> already worried about how slow a parallel port implementation would be 
>> relative to a true system bus connection.  And I think the tricky part about 
>> what you said is the word "internal" as it relates to Bluetooth.  Most 
>> people don't want to take their machines apart and take a soldering iron to 
>> them, myself included and I even have the skills to do it (or at least I 
>> tell myself I do ;)
>> 
>> As far as the how, the SysROM has multiple RST 7 hooks for sending 
>> characters to the LCD.  And it uses RAM variables to record the current 
>> screen dimensions (which are initialized to 40x8).  Redirecting to anything 
>> other than the internal LCD (i.e. DVI system bus, parallel port, serial 
>> port, etc.) requires installing a relatively small .CO program and RST7 
>> hooks to intercept the data going to the LCD.  And BASIC has a WIDTH command 
>> for setting the width to either 40 or 80.  But the WIDTH command will fail 
>> unless you have actually installed a RST7 hook to handle it.
>> 
>> Ken
>> 
>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:09 AM, MikeS <dm...@torfree.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: Gmail 
>>> To: Model 100 Discussion 
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 11:22 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [M100] TDock
>>> 
>>> Ken,
>>>  
>>> Tell me more!
>>>  
>>> Pretty well everything that's being discussed is already available today; 
>>> connect to an old laptop via Bluetooth and you've got your display 
>>> interface, USB/SD/HD storage, WiFi etc. If that $9.00 SBC becomes a reality 
>>> it should be able to do the same thing, sort of a wireless super-NADSbox..
>>>  
>>> That's the way I'd go, a separately powered portable standalone device 
>>> linked to the ModelT via (internal) Bluetooth.
>>>  
>>> When I put the M100's display up on the big screen TV it was usually for 
>>> playing M100 format text games and puzzles while reclining on the couch so 
>>> 80 column mode wasn't really an issue for me, but I did investigate the 80 
>>> column screen mode a bit way back when with no success.
>>>  
>>> I then assumed it was part of the DVI DOS but I gather it's actually 
>>> included in the basic BASIC; any hints about how to get at it, preferably 
>>> redirecting out the serial port?
>>>  
>>> And of course then there's the issue of drawing graphics on an 80x25 
>>> equivalent display... ;-)
>>>  
>>> m
>>>  
>>> ----------------
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> Hi Bob,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Actually no ROM changes are needed.  The existing ROM already supports 
>>> 80x25 text mode displays (though not for the MENU program).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Ken  
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On May 20, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Bob Pigford <rpigfo...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I agree with Van and others:  TDOCK needs to be a Dock (not portable) and 
>>> may be powered with a wall wart.  For me, an 80 X 25 display would be the 
>>> ultimate goal, not just duplicating the ModelT screen on a larger display.  
>>> For instance, I think one might already be able to run VirtualT on a 
>>> Raspberry Pi and have a virtual ModelT on a larger screen, but what is the 
>>> point in that.  
>>> 
>>> I want to have the great ModelT keyboard, serial & parallel ports, etc, on 
>>> my desk while looking at a full screen of characters.  The hardest part of 
>>> that might be the changes to the ROM.  I will point out that Steve鈥檚 REX 
>>> can be operated in ROM replacement mode such that a custom modified 鈥渟oft鈥� 
>>> ROM (adjusted for 80 X 25 display) can be used without actually creating or 
>>> requiring a new physical ROM.
>>> 
>>> SD card storage in TDOCK would also be terrific freeing the serial port for 
>>> BlueM.
>>> 
>>> I think that HDMI may be the best video solution for TDOCK, and there are 
>>> many small HDMI screen choices  available.  For example, see 
>>> http://www.adafruit.com/category/63  
>>> If you only have a VGA screen, then an HDMI to VGA adapter could be used.  
>>> I am doing this now with a RPi and a VGA screen.
>>> 
>>> I think that Wifi and internet connectivity delivered directly from TDOCK 
>>> might be way down the road, but Ken鈥檚 initial design could allow design 
>>> 鈥渟pace鈥� for that later enhancement.
>>> 
>>> As to Ken鈥檚 question about I/O capability (like A/D and digital pins), that 
>>> would be nice but not necessary.  If you want to touch the real world of 
>>> sensors, motors, and the like, a serial connection to an Arduino will 
>>> suffice (cheap hardware and easier programming on the ModelT end).  Of 
>>> course, if a Raspberry Pi were to be used as the engine under the TDOCK 
>>> hood, I/O pins and HDMI are already there, as well as USB ports for add-ons 
>>> like Wifi.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> \
>> 

Reply via email to