I noticed no change in the power draw on my 102 when using the serial port,
although it wasn't actually connected to another device.
On Dec 9, 2015 1:06 AM, "John Whitton" <jwhit...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Mike,
>
>     M102, and it was running its own monitoring program, that's how it (I)
> knew run time. When it pooped out, the last time was recorded. It was, in
> fact , monitoring its own battery voltage via an ADIOS. One might argue
> that the RS-232 ate some power, but it was only OPENed when making a
> measurement at 5 minute intervals, then closed.
>
>     If you recall, I also (later) embedded an A/D in a M102, which can
> measure both external voltages as well as monitor battery voltage. I could
> run the same test now, without having to hook anything up at all. Cheesy
> video of that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMV2HKwrCCc
>
> John W.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Model 100 Discussion <m100@lists.bitchin100.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 09, 2015 12:50 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] M100 power requirements
>
> Was this an M100 or a 102, and what if anything was it running?
>
> Looks like an app for the ADIOS ;-)
>
> m
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* John Whitton <jwhit...@bellsouth.net>
> *To:* Model 100 Discussion <m100@lists.bitchin100.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2015 11:04 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] M100 power requirements
>
> *?*
>
>     Hmm. I do not recall, but I'm betting that the supply was tied to the
> battery terminals, otherwise I would have had to make up a pigtail to use
> the jack. I wouldn't bet my life on that...
>
>     As an aside, I attach here a plot of battery voltage vs. time. This
> was recorded using fully charged 2400mA NiMH batteries. Cutoff occured at
> 1407 minutes. Note the abrupt knee at the end of the useful battery
> charge/energy. That is characteristic of NiMH batteries. Alkalines have a
> more gradual slope
>
> John W.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Josh Malone <josh.mal...@gmail.com>
> *To:* Model 100 Discussion <m100@lists.bitchin100.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:14 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [M100] M100 power requirements
>
> Awesome, thank you. Any idea if this was measured with supply connected to
> the dc jack or the battery terminals?
> On Dec 8, 2015 5:53 PM, "John Whitton" <jwhit...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> FWIW, find attached a .pdf graph of M102 power consumption. This was
>> compiled 6 years ago (hard to believe).
>>
>> John W.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Josh Malone <josh.mal...@gmail.com>
>> *To:* Model 100 Discussion <m100@lists.bitchin100.com>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:02 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [M100] USB "juice pack"
>>
>> I just tested the power requirements of my 102. With the battery
>> connectors connected to a bench supply at 5 volts, it draws a very
>> consistent 65mA. I was expecting the current to vary slightly with CPU or
>> screen activity but it does not. I'm so used to CPU idle states which, of
>> course, the 8085 does not use :)
>>
>> I have one of these kicking around at home (
>> https://www.sparkfun.com/products/10968) so I'm thinking to construct a
>> LiPo-based AA battery replacement so I can recharge my 102 via USB. There's
>> also https://www.sparkfun.com/products/11231 but that's capable of WAY
>> more current than necessary and considerably more expensive.
>>
>> -Josh
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Mike Stein <mhs.st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I was wondering about that, especially with WiFi; definitely
>>> sounds a little high. Too bad.
>>>
>>> Maybe Jeff's solution isn't such a bad idea after all ;-)
>>>
>>> Anyway, the M100 works fine on a "juice pack".
>>>
>>> m
>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to