https://photos.app.goo.gl/3jkaHxX1P7RlQALt2
now I just need a couple quads :D Greg On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Gregory McGill <[email protected]> wrote: > Btw i got them yesterday Josh thanks again! > > Greg > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Josh Malone <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I programmed the 4.9 release on the 2 I built for Greg. >> >> I got them from a file called R49_M100T102_236_rebuild.zip >> >> with checksums: >> >> 5ddfff2652f3757a54cfbb98aca6196e rf149.co >> dcc1d9ef47b4673ea782a02bd6b5b575 RXF149.BR >> 9e71cace85983e42a2f8c2a1f1f8894d tsd100.bx >> >> and timestamps: >> >> 4853 Nov 29 2015 rf149.co >> 32768 Nov 29 2015 RXF149.BR >> 32768 Aug 5 2009 tsd100.bx >> >> It contained the Y2K patch and I had no issues with it. >> >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Jim Anderson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > So I finally got all my parts - the items from China came much sooner >> than expected, with three parcels arriving at once on Tuesday. Yay! This >> included the AM29F800BB-70EC chips, so I was able to build the first one >> using one of those, although I also ordered a couple of MX29F800CBTI-70G >> from DigiKey which seem like they might be a suitable replacement. I'm >> going to try building the next one using one of those chips and report back >> on success or failure. >> > >> > I built the first one last night and managed to possibly ruin one >> voltage regulator (depending on how much heat they can take (opinions >> welcome), because I bridged the three pads on one side and ended up having >> to remove it from the board, which took a lot longer than I had wanted). >> Otherwise, it was a success and is working properly. >> > >> > Question for Stephen or others in-the-know: I installed the 4.9 >> software release linked to from the 'Building a REX' wiki page - it's in >> the file 'Beta R49 Dec 7 2013.zip' in Stephen's Member Upload Library area >> on club100.org in a folder titled 'REX 4.9 Beta'. After installation I >> started to wonder if this was the best version of 4.9 to use, since I >> remember reading that 4.9 included a Y2K patch for the menu, and my menu >> still says 1900. >> > >> > Looking on the 'REX Release 4.9' page on bitchin100.com, I see >> revision 236 (which says it's buggy) and revision 162, both of which date >> from 2015, leading me to conclude they're newer than the one I installed >> (based on the date in 2013, since the version I installed has no revision >> number)... would these be the releases with the Y2K menu patch? Is the >> version I installed buggy and/or otherwise to be avoided? >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > jim >> > >> > >
