Unfortunately the QUAD is only for the M100 not the T102 :( http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=QUAD
It is a very nice addition to the M100 though, especially with the REX in place. From: M100 <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Gregory McGill <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 10:14 PM To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [M100] REX build - which 4.9 release to use? https://photos.app.goo.gl/3jkaHxX1P7RlQALt2 now I just need a couple quads :D Greg On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Gregory McGill <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Btw i got them yesterday Josh thanks again! Greg On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Josh Malone <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I programmed the 4.9 release on the 2 I built for Greg. I got them from a file called R49_M100T102_236_rebuild.zip with checksums: 5ddfff2652f3757a54cfbb98aca6196e rf149.co<http://rf149.co> dcc1d9ef47b4673ea782a02bd6b5b575 RXF149.BR<http://RXF149.BR> 9e71cace85983e42a2f8c2a1f1f8894d tsd100.bx and timestamps: 4853 Nov 29 2015 rf149.co<http://rf149.co> 32768 Nov 29 2015 RXF149.BR<http://RXF149.BR> 32768 Aug 5 2009 tsd100.bx It contained the Y2K patch and I had no issues with it. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Jim Anderson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > So I finally got all my parts - the items from China came much sooner than > expected, with three parcels arriving at once on Tuesday. Yay! This > included the AM29F800BB-70EC chips, so I was able to build the first one > using one of those, although I also ordered a couple of MX29F800CBTI-70G from > DigiKey which seem like they might be a suitable replacement. I'm going to > try building the next one using one of those chips and report back on success > or failure. > > I built the first one last night and managed to possibly ruin one voltage > regulator (depending on how much heat they can take (opinions welcome), > because I bridged the three pads on one side and ended up having to remove it > from the board, which took a lot longer than I had wanted). Otherwise, it > was a success and is working properly. > > Question for Stephen or others in-the-know: I installed the 4.9 software > release linked to from the 'Building a REX' wiki page - it's in the file > 'Beta R49 Dec 7 2013.zip' in Stephen's Member Upload Library area on > club100.org<http://club100.org> in a folder titled 'REX 4.9 Beta'. After > installation I started to wonder if this was the best version of 4.9 to use, > since I remember reading that 4.9 included a Y2K patch for the menu, and my > menu still says 1900. > > Looking on the 'REX Release 4.9' page on > bitchin100.com<http://bitchin100.com>, I see revision 236 (which says it's > buggy) and revision 162, both of which date from 2015, leading me to conclude > they're newer than the one I installed (based on the date in 2013, since the > version I installed has no revision number)... would these be the releases > with the Y2K menu patch? Is the version I installed buggy and/or otherwise > to be avoided? > > > > > > > > jim >
