Kurt -

NiCds are all I use in my 8201a's  -  They both act identically to yours.

Years ago I rearranged WATCHDOG.CO to display elapsed-time where

the M$ blurb usually appears,  which scratched my itch for a little more

battery certainty.  I reset it when I change batteries  -  Not perfect,  but

good enough.

If you pursue tweaking the battery light circuit I hope you write it up...

   Jack





On 6/12/18, Kurt McCullum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, I'm comfortable with soldering a new resistor, but the NEC was
> originally sold with both a NiCd battery pack and a standard Alkaline
> battery pack. The only difference between the two is the charging
> resistor and a jumper. I would assume that the power supply would know,
> based on the type of pack plugged in, how to adjust for this. But I
> have no evidence of this. I have restored both an original NiCd battery
> pack and converted a standard pack to be rechargeable. Both show the
> same behavior.
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, at 8:17 PM, Doug Jackson wrote:
>> Kurt,
>>
>> I'm sure it would be possible to adjust the threshold where the LED
>> illuminates to match the new battery chemistry.  It's probably a
>> resistor change.>
>> Are you comfortable with soldering on the logic board?
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Jun. 2018, 12:36 pm Kurt McCullum,
>> <[email protected]> wrote:>> __
>>> I've got several battery holders for my NEC units. I have converted a
>>> couple to recharge batteries by following the instructions on
>>> Web8201.net. The 71.5k resistor was the hardest part to find and in
>>> the end I bought 100 of them. The batteries charge fine, and work ok.
>>> But what I notice is that the low battery light comes one after only
>>> an hour or so. I can still run the machine for another 15+ hours but
>>> the light is always on. This I assume is due to the fact that the
>>> batteries are 1.2v rechargeable instead of 1.5 alkaline.>>
>>> So my question, has anyone tried using the 1.5 rechargeable alkaline
>>> batteries? if so, how did it work for you.>>
>>> Kurt
>
>

Reply via email to