Omg please please don't let me miss out on this. Thanks for working on this buddy, I love my M100. Would love a REX :-)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [M100] NADSBoxes
From: Bert Put
To: m...@bitchin100.com
CC:
To anyone who is thinking about getting a NADSbox: GET ONE. Don't
hesitate! I've owned one for years (from Ken's original batch) and it
has worked flawlessly every time. You will not regret it.
Cheers, Bert
On 9/13/19 12:59 PM, Ken Pettit wrote:
> Hey Gang,
>
> Some time ago I sent an email that I was working on getting a handful of
> NADSBoxes ready for sale.?? These were the "fall-out" from PCB yeild
> issues I experienced in 2008, and all of these needed a fair amount of
> TLC to get them working.?? After I sent that email, I ended up going to
> the hospital a couple of times for angioplasty, bypass surgery, etc.
>
> Well I have been back on it for the past few days and am getting close
> to having them ready.?? I currently have 12 that I know (or at least
> strongly believe) work, but I think I can get this number of to 15 by
> next week.?? I have ordered new CR2032 RTC backup batteries and
> additional DB9 - DB25 connectors which should arrive in 3-4 days.?? I
> plan to spend the rest of today and the weekend fininshing up final
> testing and assembly of the 12 units I know work, then will focus on
> getting the other 3 that I *think* I can get working.
>
> I expect to be able to make an announcement sometime next week about
> putting them on sale.?? I will post a message to this list regarding the
> time they will go on sale so everyone knows when it will happen.?? Then
> after the actual sale announcement, I think it will have to be a
> first-come first-serve basis.?? Not sure how else to do it if there are
> more than 12-15 people who want one, but I'm open to suggestions.?? I
> will sell only one to each person ... please don't ask for more than
> one, it won't happen.
>
> Attached is a photo of the raw materials (i.e. not yet assembled, still
> awaiting final rigorous testing).?? Low resolution to keep the file size
> small, but you get the idea.
>
> Ken
