I've had my 102 for many years, although not since it was the latest thing. I lusted after one when they were new but I was just a kid. I was very fortunate to get a Tandy 1400LT to take to college from my generous parents, but didn't get a Model T until sometime in the early 2000s from Craigslist. It seems "recent" and yet that is almost 20 years ago at this point.
I wanted a separate Model T to try out CP/M so I bought an M100. It had some LCD issues which I still haven't addressed but I managed to score a good price on another M100 bundle so now I have two. Much like my CoCos, somehow these things seem to multiply. On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 19:57 -0700, David Rogers wrote: > What Kevin said, except I just happen to still have the 100, 102, 200 > and NEC units from the days when they were the latest thing. But I > used CP/M in those days and found it to be easy to use and effective > for the relative simplicity of the computers of the day. CP/M over, > e.g., WordPerfect any day. But I like one mailing list to cover them > all. > > David > > C’est la vie, c’est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de terre. > > On May 11, 2020, at 7:49 PM, Kevin Becker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'd prefer one list for all M100 stuff but I suppose it doesn't > > matter > > much either way. I'm not likely to be much of a contributor but I'm > > very interested in trying out CP/M and even bought a (okay several) > > M100 just for this purpose. > > > > > > On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 22:40 -0400, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > I have started to update the REX wiki for my new projects: > > > REXCPM > > > and > > > REX# aka REXsharp > > > a work in progress..... > > > Anyhow, we have a mailing list for CP/M use on Model 100 called > > > MTCPM. I wonder if we should revive that for CP/M discussions > > > now, > > > or should we keep CP/M here on this list? > > > thoughts? > > > Steve
