My two cents - One list works better for me. Thanks to the guys doing the heavy lifting...
... On 5/11/20, Philip Avery <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I think keep it on this list. Then it covers the REX part of REXCPM. > > Philip > > On 12/05/2020 3:52 pm, Stephen Adolph wrote: >> After I wrote the note, I wondered if using the other list really made >> sense; it would divide the discussions. >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:57 PM David Rogers <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> What Kevin said, except I just happen to still have the 100, 102, >> 200 and NEC units from the days when they were the latest thing. >> But I used CP/M in those days and found it to be easy to use and >> effective for the relative simplicity of the computers of the day. >> CP/M over, e.g., WordPerfect any day. But I like one mailing list >> to cover them all. >> >> David >> >> */C’est la vie, c’est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de >> terre./* >> >> On May 11, 2020, at 7:49 PM, Kevin Becker <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>> I'd prefer one list for all M100 stuff but I suppose it doesn't >>> matter >>> much either way. I'm not likely to be much of a contributor but I'm >>> very interested in trying out CP/M and even bought a (okay several) >>> M100 just for this purpose. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 22:40 -0400, Stephen Adolph wrote: >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> I have started to update the REX wiki for my new projects: >>>> REXCPM >>>> and >>>> REX# aka REXsharp >>>> >>>> a work in progress..... >>>> >>>> Anyhow, we have a mailing list for CP/M use on Model 100 called >>>> MTCPM. I wonder if we should revive that for CP/M discussions now, >>>> or should we keep CP/M here on this list? >>>> >>>> thoughts? >>>> >>>> Steve >>> > >
