After I wrote the note, I wondered if using the other list really made sense; it would divide the discussions.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:57 PM David Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > What Kevin said, except I just happen to still have the 100, 102, 200 and > NEC units from the days when they were the latest thing. But I used CP/M in > those days and found it to be easy to use and effective for the relative > simplicity of the computers of the day. CP/M over, e.g., WordPerfect any > day. But I like one mailing list to cover them all. > > David > > *C’est la vie, c’est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de terre.* > > On May 11, 2020, at 7:49 PM, Kevin Becker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd prefer one list for all M100 stuff but I suppose it doesn't matter > much either way. I'm not likely to be much of a contributor but I'm > very interested in trying out CP/M and even bought a (okay several) > M100 just for this purpose. > > > On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 22:40 -0400, Stephen Adolph wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > I have started to update the REX wiki for my new projects: > > REXCPM > > and > > REX# aka REXsharp > > > a work in progress..... > > > Anyhow, we have a mailing list for CP/M use on Model 100 called > > MTCPM. I wonder if we should revive that for CP/M discussions now, > > or should we keep CP/M here on this list? > > > thoughts? > > > Steve > > >
