Hi, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > Hi! > >>> This leads me to belive two different scenarios >>> 1) The driver / BisonCam application is braindead and the software >>> scales everything. > > Oh yeah, that's a possibility. The windows driver for my > m5603c/mt9v011 does all the color conversion, filtering, noise > reduction in software, heh. I remember that the CPU utilization tops > at 70% during the capture which is insane and unpractical for a USB > device such as a cheap webcam.
If this is the case then we're pretty much screwed on unlocking the more advanced features unless some hardware docs on the m5602 surface. > I think that a driver should reflect > the exact capabilities of the piece of hardware it's controlling. Indeed, doing things in software when hardware is available is just crazy. Regards, Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ M560x-driver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/m560x-driver-devel
