right .. I see what you mean.

Thank you,
Forum

Quoting Steve Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Depends on how you decide to solve the coherence problem.  There will
> probably be some hacking on the caches as well (for example if you
> decide that you need to enforce inclusion in the L2s).
>
> Steve
>
> Forum Mangal Parmar wrote:
> > got it. thanks :)
> > one last question. what files must be modified? only the
> coherance_protocol
> > files?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Forum
> >
> > Quoting Steve Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> There shouldn't be any issues other than coherence.  Structurally it's
> >> no problem to build whatever kind of cache hierarchy you want
> (including
> >> the one you describe), it's just that the existing coherence protocol
> >> won't deal with it properly.  You'll have to decide for yourself how
> you
> >> want to manage coherence with your hierarchy and then implement that.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> Forum Mangal Parmar wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I am not sure if I was clear in the last mail.
> >>>
> >>> I am looking at a multi-cpu scenario.
> >>>
> >>> Currently the M5 1.0 has private L1 caches and a shared L2 cache.
> >>>
> >>> I want to make private L2 caches for every cpu and add another shared
> >> L3
> >>> cache.
> >>>
> >>> I just wanted to make sure that I was on the right track. I am
> planning
> >> to
> >>> add the L2, L3 cache defnitions with appropriate bus interfaces in my
> >>> python scripts.
> >>>
> >>> However, Im thinking there could be coherance issues that may need to
> >> be
> >>> resolved if the L2 is now private (for example like mentioned in this
> >> post:
> >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00223.html).
> >>> It would be great if you could point out any other issues I need to
> >> take
> >>> care of.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks a ton for the help,
> >>> Forum
> >>>
> >>> Quoting Forum Mangal Parmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>
> >>>> I mean split per-cpu.
> >>>> and yes I meant coherence.
> >>>>
> >>>> Quoting Steve Reinhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> When you say "split", do you mean split I/D or split per-CPU?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "synchronization": are you
> >> talking
> >>>>> about coherence?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Finally, please post m5 questions to the m5-users mailing list
> rather
> >>>>> than sending them directly to me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Steve
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Forum Mangal Parmar wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Steve,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am trying to understand the way the split cache implementation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I had one very specific question about m5 1.0. If I want to make
> the
> >>>> L2
> >>>>>> split instead of shared in a multicore situation my question is:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. Is it sufficient to make a .py file with each cpu having a L1
> and
> >>>> L2
> >>>>>> cache (ie declare the L2 cache in a similar way to L1) and then
> >>>>> replicate
> >>>>>> multiple cpus. In this case I will just replicate the L1 to get
> the
> >>>> L2
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>> make one-to-one bus connections between every L1 and L2 and the
> next
> >>>>> level
> >>>>>> will be a shared L3 just delared in the same way as L2 is
> currently.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> or
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2. Do I need to change the c++ code for synchronization of the
> split
> >>>>> caches?
> >>>>>> (ie do something like what is done in m5 2.0)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>> Forum
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> m5-users mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> m5-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > m5-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
>


_______________________________________________
m5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Reply via email to