I never knew any of those cumpeny's caried it Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:16 AM, "Alphonso McFadden" <[email protected]> wrote: > When did boost start carrying the I phone? > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pedro Martinez" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; "Mobile Accessibility Android Users List" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:26 PM > Subject: Re: [MA] having the ma e mail work with multiple accounts,and the > frustration of a simple upgrade > > >> It’s really sad, and at this point pathetic, that code factory, has not been >> able to make these very simple adjustments to the M.A. application. >> Google, have made their O.S. accessible with the new Ice-cream sandwich, and >> now jellybean, and code factory is still yet to release the latest upgraded >> of m.a. with the modifications that’s needed to make the android o.s. more >> accessible. >> I am tired and board waiting for their little simple upgrades that I am >> seriously considering jumping the bandwagon, and start drinking that apple >> coo-lade. >> Now that both virgin, and boost mobile companies are selling the IPhone 4S, >> on their unlimited $55 plans. >> Note: I am in no way, promoting the IPhone, but just voicing my opinion… and >> frustration, on the lack of code factory’s ability to release their little >> upgrade, with simple modifications. >> >> Because of C.F. inability to accommodate their customers, I will never buy >> anything from them again. >> They just care to upgrade m.s. a speech program that not many people use >> these days. Well at lease not here in the USA. >> So thank you code factory for losing my confidence in your company. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Dusty Tague >> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:01 AM >> To: Alphonso McFadden >> Cc: Mobile Accessibility Android Users List >> Subject: Re: [MA] having the ma e mail work with multiple accounts >> >> These things have been a year in the waiting. I am not saying, next >> month have them all fixed. I Say, instead of one big byte, little >> nibbles which are more manageable are what is required here. Some of >> the enhancements are simple and can be rolled out quickly, others will >> take longer. My point, it isn't something that can't be done and >> something that should have been done. If I can get a phone with Jelly >> Bean, I see little need to buy a phone that runs on Gingerbread or ICS >> and paying the $$$ for MA, even if still slightly cheaper to do so. I >> don't know about you, I don't have money to throw away and so when I >> part with it, I want the best product I can afford. Right now, it isn't >> Mobile Accessibility. Sure, for some I recommend it, but unless you are >> lucky enough to get it for free, on the more modern phones with the most >> up to date Android releases, there is not much that MA does better >> anymore and often the benefits for using other third party applications >> and stock apps when made accessible at times more then offset the >> benefits of mobile accessibility. For example, I prefer MA's GMail >> reader to the stock one, despite not having the capabilities to move >> emails to another folder. Why, I can read my email and select links >> easier in MA's version. Extending IMAP to other email services and >> adding POP3 support would make the email app superior to anything out >> there that can only be matched if the stock email app in Jelly bean is >> accessible. I use the nightly firefox builds And if they can >> distuingish between a file to be streamed, from one that needs to be >> downloaded, maybe a plugin is needed, and the ability to navigate the >> page and read it by chunks, it is the best browser out there. Since >> google Chrome isn't available on my Gingerbread device, I can't >> compare. So if there is a better alternative, free or not, people will >> flee to it. Code Factory needs to remember this as well, Even though >> Carriers are sometimes subsidize MA, they won't continue to do so if >> they don't have to and guess what, it is getting to the point where they >> don't have to. As a result, Code factory needs to make their product >> something that people will continue clambering for. >> >> By the way, I have a degree in software engineering and write code, so I >> am well aware of the difficulties. I am also a customer and I don't >> care, I don't want promises when I buy a product, I want it to work and >> work as I expect it to. >> >> >> On 7/30/2012 7:17 AM, Alphonso McFadden wrote: >>> It may not be as easy as we think. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dusty Tague" <[email protected]> >>> To: "Mobile Accessibility Android Users List" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 2:59 AM >>> Subject: Re: [MA] having the ma e mail work with multiple accounts >>> >>> >>>> This, and other feature enhancements were called for from the beginning. >>>> Only one request, adding braille support was implemented, and many >>>> enhancements that should have been implemented simultaneously were not. I >>>> suppose, as a free option paid for by the cellular carriers, we should be >>>> grateful for what we have, but for those of us that shelled out the one >>>> hundred dollars to purchase a half baked product, we expect to do >>>> everything that the native apps do, nothing less. We have less right now >>>> and have been basically told by code factory, we will determine what you >>>> really need. It isn't thier job to tell us, but to respond to our >>>> demands. Now let's see if we can get the enhancements we requested. If >>>> they rise to the challenge, we should have had peridocal updates that add >>>> these function enhancements we requested from this point forward. It >>>> shouldn't take more than a month for each enhancement to be coded, tested, >>>> and packaged for an update. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/27/2012 9:07 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> has this been considered? i hope so it would make e mail on my phone much >>>>> easier >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ma_mailing mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ma_mailing mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ma_mailing mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing >> _______________________________________________ >> ma_mailing mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing > > _______________________________________________ > ma_mailing mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing _______________________________________________ ma_mailing mailing list [email protected] http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing
