I could see leaving MA behind but not android completely. On Jul 31, 2012 11:07 AM, "Pedro Martinez" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, they do, but, Sorry, I cannot promote those phones, or engage in a > conversation about them. > You will need to go to their website, for more information. > > -----Original Message----- From: David Rolon > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 8:56 AM > To: Mobile Accessibility Android Users List > Cc: Mobile Accessibility Android Users List > Subject: Re: [MA] having the ma e mail work with multiple accounts,and the > frustration of a simple upgrade > > I never knew any of those cumpeny's caried it > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:16 AM, "Alphonso McFadden" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > When did boost start carrying the I phone? >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pedro Martinez" < >> [email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]>; "Mobile Accessibility Android Users List" < >> [email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 11:26 PM >> Subject: Re: [MA] having the ma e mail work with multiple accounts,and >> the frustration of a simple upgrade >> >> >> It’s really sad, and at this point pathetic, that code factory, has not >>> been able to make these very simple adjustments to the M.A. application. >>> Google, have made their O.S. accessible with the new Ice-cream sandwich, >>> and now jellybean, and code factory is still yet to release the latest >>> upgraded of m.a. with the modifications that’s needed to make the android >>> o.s. more accessible. >>> I am tired and board waiting for their little simple upgrades that I am >>> seriously considering jumping the bandwagon, and start drinking that apple >>> coo-lade. >>> Now that both virgin, and boost mobile companies are selling the IPhone >>> 4S, on their unlimited $55 plans. >>> Note: I am in no way, promoting the IPhone, but just voicing my opinion… >>> and frustration, on the lack of code factory’s ability to release their >>> little upgrade, with simple modifications. >>> >>> Because of C.F. inability to accommodate their customers, I will never >>> buy anything from them again. >>> They just care to upgrade m.s. a speech program that not many people use >>> these days. Well at lease not here in the USA. >>> So thank you code factory for losing my confidence in your >>> company. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- From: Dusty Tague >>> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 10:01 AM >>> To: Alphonso McFadden >>> Cc: Mobile Accessibility Android Users List >>> Subject: Re: [MA] having the ma e mail work with multiple accounts >>> >>> These things have been a year in the waiting. I am not saying, next >>> month have them all fixed. I Say, instead of one big byte, little >>> nibbles which are more manageable are what is required here. Some of >>> the enhancements are simple and can be rolled out quickly, others will >>> take longer. My point, it isn't something that can't be done and >>> something that should have been done. If I can get a phone with Jelly >>> Bean, I see little need to buy a phone that runs on Gingerbread or ICS >>> and paying the $$$ for MA, even if still slightly cheaper to do so. I >>> don't know about you, I don't have money to throw away and so when I >>> part with it, I want the best product I can afford. Right now, it isn't >>> Mobile Accessibility. Sure, for some I recommend it, but unless you are >>> lucky enough to get it for free, on the more modern phones with the most >>> up to date Android releases, there is not much that MA does better >>> anymore and often the benefits for using other third party applications >>> and stock apps when made accessible at times more then offset the >>> benefits of mobile accessibility. For example, I prefer MA's GMail >>> reader to the stock one, despite not having the capabilities to move >>> emails to another folder. Why, I can read my email and select links >>> easier in MA's version. Extending IMAP to other email services and >>> adding POP3 support would make the email app superior to anything out >>> there that can only be matched if the stock email app in Jelly bean is >>> accessible. I use the nightly firefox builds And if they can >>> distuingish between a file to be streamed, from one that needs to be >>> downloaded, maybe a plugin is needed, and the ability to navigate the >>> page and read it by chunks, it is the best browser out there. Since >>> google Chrome isn't available on my Gingerbread device, I can't >>> compare. So if there is a better alternative, free or not, people will >>> flee to it. Code Factory needs to remember this as well, Even though >>> Carriers are sometimes subsidize MA, they won't continue to do so if >>> they don't have to and guess what, it is getting to the point where they >>> don't have to. As a result, Code factory needs to make their product >>> something that people will continue clambering for. >>> >>> By the way, I have a degree in software engineering and write code, so I >>> am well aware of the difficulties. I am also a customer and I don't >>> care, I don't want promises when I buy a product, I want it to work and >>> work as I expect it to. >>> >>> >>> On 7/30/2012 7:17 AM, Alphonso McFadden wrote: >>> >>>> It may not be as easy as we think. >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dusty Tague" <[email protected]> >>>> To: "Mobile Accessibility Android Users List" < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 2:59 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [MA] having the ma e mail work with multiple accounts >>>> >>>> >>>> This, and other feature enhancements were called for from the >>>>> beginning. Only one request, adding braille support was implemented, and >>>>> many enhancements that should have been implemented simultaneously were >>>>> not. I suppose, as a free option paid for by the cellular carriers, we >>>>> should be grateful for what we have, but for those of us that shelled out >>>>> the one hundred dollars to purchase a half baked product, we expect to do >>>>> everything that the native apps do, nothing less. We have less right now >>>>> and have been basically told by code factory, we will determine what you >>>>> really need. It isn't thier job to tell us, but to respond to our >>>>> demands. >>>>> Now let's see if we can get the enhancements we requested. If they rise >>>>> to the challenge, we should have had peridocal updates that add these >>>>> function enhancements we requested from this point forward. It shouldn't >>>>> take more than a month for each enhancement to be coded, tested, and >>>>> packaged for an update. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 7/27/2012 9:07 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> has this been considered? i hope so it would make e mail on my phone >>>>>> much easier >>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>>> ma_mailing mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://list.codefactory.cat/**mailman/listinfo/codefactory.** >>>>>> cat.ma_mailing<http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>> ma_mailing mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://list.codefactory.cat/**mailman/listinfo/codefactory.** >>>>> cat.ma_mailing<http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> ma_mailing mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://list.codefactory.cat/**mailman/listinfo/codefactory.** >>> cat.ma_mailing<http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> ma_mailing mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://list.codefactory.cat/**mailman/listinfo/codefactory.** >>> cat.ma_mailing<http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing> >>> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> ma_mailing mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.codefactory.cat/**mailman/listinfo/codefactory.** >> cat.ma_mailing<http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > ma_mailing mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.codefactory.cat/**mailman/listinfo/codefactory.** > cat.ma_mailing<http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing> > ______________________________**_________________ > ma_mailing mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.codefactory.cat/**mailman/listinfo/codefactory.** > cat.ma_mailing<http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing> >
_______________________________________________ ma_mailing mailing list [email protected] http://list.codefactory.cat/mailman/listinfo/codefactory.cat.ma_mailing
