Hi, Am Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:33:35 +0200 schrieb Provincia San Benedetto di Don Orione: > Il giorno 05/giu/07, alle 16:41, Randy Saunders ha scritto: > >> You should add an FAQ entry that answers the >> question "What's the difference between OpenOffice >> Aqua and NeoOffice?" > >> It is a good idea, sometimes ago there was a direct link to >> neooffice from openoffice.org page for mac, but the shortsight >> of mac > openoffice.org's team removed it. It is silly that the only > working aqua porting of openoffice.org for mac is not mentioned > in openoffice.org mac page, but talking about neooffice here is > like a tabù.
And that's fine! > So, neooffice exist, it is the only openoffice.org aqua porting > working now, everybody is suggesting it for a daily work office, > but you can not find any resource or info here. Why the hell should we help a fork of OpenOffice.org? Did they help us? No. None of their coders even made and attempt to help us getting the basic stuff of OOo 2.x running. They simply waited until we had 2.0.x ported to Mac OS X Panther later Tiger and in the end to Intel PC - took our code, made some more or less stable additions, sold this for 20 bucks or so to early subscribers and that's it. Still they get all the attention and users blame us. All they can say is that they made a nice GUI to an existing product. And this can't be that hard. So I guess they are good in overacting etc. Everytime we fixed something important in our code we read in their forums that they did a heroic task in getting this bug squashed. Sorry for being harsh but it's simply not true that we are the bad guys and Neo folks are the hereos of the day. Eric -- ## de.OpenOffice.org - Office für MacOS X, Linux, Solaris & Windows ## Openoffice.org - ich steck mit drin! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
