Thank you for your reply Eric! I saw that you modified the user
directory but I also meant the application file name. This was
actually the reason why I didn't drag the file into the application
folder as it would overwrite the X11 2.3 application file. So maybe
you can rename the .app file as well to e.g. OpenOffice.org 2.3 aqua.app
Best regards
Helge
--
Helge Kraak
Frauenlobstr. 78a
60487 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Mobil: +49 (0)178 828 80 90
Telefon: +49 (0)69 979 466 23
VoIP (SIP): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: +49 (0)32 22 11 64 788
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: www.helge.kraak.info
ICQ: 348131950
Am 06.06.2007 um 15:02 schrieb eric.bachard:
Hi Helge,
Helge Kraak a écrit :
Some days ago I wrote that I have a low performance of the aqua
version on my powerbook 1,25 GHz, 1 GB RAM.
Exactly the same machine than mine ! I bought another laptop
since, but it works fine.
I forgot to say that I started OO directly from the .dmg file.
Now that I dragged the application into a folder on the disk the
performance seems to have improved significiantly.
Ok, now I understand. Thanks for pointing us this important point
(I'm pretty sure the issue will occur)
Maybe you should add a hint to the readme files.
Yes, and/or in the FAQ
The reason why I didn't drag the application into the
applications folder was that I already had the X11 dev build of
2.3 there and didn't want to overwrite it.
FYI, I have modified the bootstrap for user install dir. aqua
version does use :
~/Library/Application Support/OpenOffice.org-aqua
To avoid conflicts, and data loss.
Regards,
Eric Bachard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
