Hi,
Le 26 juil. 07 à 10:11, Maho NAKATA a écrit :
Right. In terms of l10n, no difference.
But some persons might find AQUA issues during the test
as well.
As I proposed during the FOSDEM, we should start Aqua QA after alpha
output.
Means end september 2007.
Don't you think so? And - there are also cons as well.
This test is not for serious developers and for include casual
users.
I don't understand what are doing serious developers here ?
FYI, in this case, mix aquavcl02 and localisation12 (when resync'ed )
is correct.
so - Eric might recieve many duplicated issues. This is
not constructive.
This is technicaly possible to add both in one build. but since
localisation12 uses m183 as reference, it is preferable to wait Sun
RE does the work : means wait for integration is more safe.
BTW: I can provide full builds of SRC680_mXYZ + cws localisation12
+ cws aquavcl02.
Please explain me why when you do that this is not a hack, and when I
do it is ?
I'd like to understand ...
Hope cws aquavcl02 and cws localisation12 are based on the
same milestone...
No, they aren't, and this is the problem ( m183 is very old )
Eric, Pavel, how do you think?
I think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not the good list, and cross post is not a
good idea.
Regards,
Eric Bachard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
