Tuxera 2.1.9 is almost there already, so I'd say it's a good candidate. The question is will this still be available under MIT licensing or are you going to make this port private ?
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Joel Reymont <[email protected]> wrote: > I have funding for a 64-bit port of MacFUSE. > > Should I start with the Tuxera source code [1]? > > [1] http://www.tuxera.com/mac/macfuse-rebel-2.1.9-src.tar.bz2 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > - mac osx device driver ninja, kernel extensions and user-land usb drivers > ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- > http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont > ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacFUSE" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en. > > -- Bryan Tri Pham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
