So Joel, is the work that you'll be doing just to add extra locking functionality or is there more? Otherwise it sounds like your funding is only going to pay for testing!! Seriously though, it would be good if you could at least contribute bug fixes back on the 2.1.9 version?
Regards, Jon On Feb 24, 3:57 am, Erik Larsson <[email protected]> wrote: > As far as I know there are no serious issues (hangs, crashes, ...) with > 64-bit support at this time, except that it would be nice to improve > locking so that more code can run concurrently (this wouldn't benefit > Tuxera much, so it's low on my list of priorities). > If someone is of a different opinion, then please post a problem > description. > > Regards, > > - Erik > > Joel Reymont skrev 2011-02-23 17.10: > > > > > > > > > On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Bryan Pham wrote: > > >> The question is will this still be available under MIT licensing or are > >> you going to make this port private ? > > My changes should be open source. > > > What are the outstanding issues? > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > - mac osx device driver ninja, kernel extensions and user-land usb drivers > > ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- > >http://wagerlabs.com| @wagerlabs |http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont > > ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
