Hi,
Anatol Pomozov skrev 2011-05-11 05.05:
I've added Erik to the list of owners (catacombae at gmail) and I
think Benjamin Fleischer deserves to be the owner of the project as
well. Benjamin, please send me your gmail.com ID.
My Gmail ID is [email protected]
Added you to the project.
Regarding membership of the Google Code project, I just looked it it and
there are three levels of involvement: 'owners', 'committers' and
'contributors'.
It's also possible to grant custom permissions to anyone in 'committers'
and 'contributors'. 'owners' can do anything including excluding other
owners.
IMO, it's wise to keep the number of owners exactly two. That way the
project is somewhat protected from a possible future power struggle,
while not being fully dependent on one single individual. What do you
think about this?
If you agree with that approach, then as project 'owners' I would
nominate myself and preferably someone who has a long history of
involvement in the project, through mailing list participation and
otherwise. Jeff Mancuso of ExpanDrive is one name that springs to mind.
Tomas Carnecky, Sam Moffatt, Graham Perrin have also been around for a
long time and have shown real commitment. (All are welcome to argue
for/against themselves or someone else.)
The way I see it, the Google code project is going to be used for
updating 'CurrentRelease.plist' and 'DeveloperRelease.plist' (in SVN),
posting downloads and updating wiki information, while the actual
development will be done through github (Google Code doesn't offer git
hosting as far as I can tell). So the Google Code project will be mostly
a funnel for what is considered an 'official' release.
Regards,
- Erik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacFUSE" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
