Benjamin Fleischer <mailto:[email protected]> June 21, 2011 3:37 PMFuse4X is owned and maintained by Anatol. Like MacFUSE it has just a single owner. Though Anatol's project is based on MacFUSE he changed quite a lot. The result is a MacFUSE successor which is binary incompatible with most existing MacFUSE filesystems. The filesystems would need to be specifically recompiled against Fuse4X for things to work. How likely is that? Keep in mind that Fuse4X is only compatible with Mac OS X 10.6. For open source projects this would be an easy task but for commercial or in general closed source projects this won't be as easy. That's why there could not have been extensive testing regarding compatibility of his MacFUSE fork with existing filesystems. From a developer's point of view this and dropping support for 10.5 is bad.Don't get me wrong, Anatol has some great ideas and I agree with him that it is important to bring MacFUSE (or whatever it is called) up to speed and restore compatibility with its Linux origin. But we should not rush things. In my opinion it is important to first release a stable and well-tested version of MacFUSE/OSXFUSE that does not change too much code-wise, is binary compatible with MacFUSE and supports Snow Leopard's 64 bit kernel. This way there is no need to recompile existing filesystems. The transition from MacFUSE to its successor will be a lot smoother this way. The second release should fully support Lion. This would be a basis we could build on and adopt some more extensive code changes.Code-wise Anatol's fork is based on Erik's kernel code to support 64 bit kernels and my port of Linux FUSE 2.8.5 to Mac OS X. On top of that he applied his own patches.Erik and I are the "owners" of the OSXFUSE project. Once we get some things worked out I'm all for adding contributors. I would like OSXFUSE to be community based to prevent the situation we now have with MacFUSE and Amit abandoning the project.
Man, this is confusing!Anatol, if you are reading this, I'm enjoying using Fuse4x, it works well for me so far, but I was under the impression that it was to be the single successor to MacFUSE. Is there any way I can convince you to combine efforts with these other guys? I ask as a completely politically neutral guy on the basis that having multiple forks of MacFUSE will be *very* confusing for end users. Heck, just transitioning from MacFUSE to any successor will be confusing enough in and of itself since it appears that the original MacFUSE project will not assist in directing from the old to new.
On the other hand, for me Anatol's version works well, so kudos to him for being the first to get 64 bit kernels and Linux FUSE 2.8.5 working together. With Lion right around the corner I hope that OSXFUSE is made available ASAP, because end users might also grow tired of waiting around for something they can use particularly once they have upgraded to Lion. A lot of users are going to go for what works today, should application developers focus on what works today, or what might work tomorrow?
All I'm saying is that from an end user perspective it will truly suck to have fragmentation and infighting resulting in the state of a FUSE solution for the Mac becoming a giant cluster***.
Just my two cents...
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group.To post to this group, send email to [email protected].To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.------------------------------------------------------------------------ Joe Auty <mailto:[email protected]> June 21, 2011 2:46 PMBenjamin Fleischer <mailto:[email protected]> June 21, 2011 2:41 PM Hi,"officially" MacFUSE is dead (as in the google code project owner abandoned the project), but there is an unofficial build which should solve your problem. You can find it athttp://www.tuxera.com/mac/macfuse-core-10.5-2.1.9.dmgThere will be a MacFUSE successor project called FUSE for OS X (OSXFUSE) which will also support Lion.Two MacFUSE successors? OSXFUSE *and* fuse4x.org?Hope this helps. Benjamin --You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group.To post to this group, send email to [email protected].To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.------------------------------------------------------------------------ Freek <mailto:[email protected]> June 21, 2011 2:06 PM Is MacFuse dead? I only found posts from 2009? I run snow leopard, 64 bit, tried to install Wuala (needs macfuse) and then spend 2 hours searching for what went wrong. What are the alternatives? I don't want to change the kernel. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------------You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group.To post to this group, send email to [email protected].To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benjamin Fleischer <mailto:[email protected]> June 21, 2011 2:41 PM Hi,"officially" MacFUSE is dead (as in the google code project owner abandoned the project), but there is an unofficial build which should solve your problem. You can find it athttp://www.tuxera.com/mac/macfuse-core-10.5-2.1.9.dmgThere will be a MacFUSE successor project called FUSE for OS X (OSXFUSE) which will also support Lion.Hope this helps. Benjamin --You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group.To post to this group, send email to [email protected].To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.------------------------------------------------------------------------ Freek <mailto:[email protected]> June 21, 2011 2:06 PM Is MacFuse dead? I only found posts from 2009? I run snow leopard, 64 bit, tried to install Wuala (needs macfuse) and then spend 2 hours searching for what went wrong. What are the alternatives? I don't want to change the kernel. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- Joe Auty, NetMusicianNetMusician helps musicians, bands and artists create beautiful, professional, custom designed, career-essential websites that are easy to maintain and to integrate with popular social networks.
www.netmusician.org <http://www.netmusician.org> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
<<inline: compose-unknown-contact.jpg>>
<<inline: postbox-contact.jpg>>
<<inline: nmtwitter.png>>
