On 30 Jun, 2011, at 6:15 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > > Would it be better if you sit with Fuse4X people and just do *one* fork > > for everyone? > +1. I really hate situations like this when separate groups of people work on > a similar stuff. Developers time is a limited factor in open-source projects, > Benjamin is a smart guy I am sure he understands it. If another fork be > created then both parties will loose.
Well then why did you rush forward with Fuse4X even though you were directly involved in the agreement in May that Erik and Benjamin should lead the project in May? > What do you mean which one is the first? osxfuse just began its development > while Fuse4X exists, fixes a bunch of compatibility issues, has a nice > website http://fuse4x.org , used by many people, downloaded more than 2500 > times. https://github.com/fuse4x/fuse4x/downloads You're pretty good at advertisement and you've used your chance well and rushed forward. Still, the truth is that https://github.com/osxfuse exists, it includes the well proven Tuxera changes and it is what many people on this list agreed on, including yourself. Just lookup your own posts from May. The future of MacFUSE should not be decided by who sets up a repository and a nice website faster. > For the opensource community good I think it worth discussing once again. > I've still not heard any strong reason for yet-another-fork existence. Well then stop doing it! --- Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
