Hi, > Would it be better if you sit with Fuse4X people and just do *one* fork for everyone?
+1. I really hate situations like this when separate groups of people work on a similar stuff. Developers time is a limited factor in open-source projects, Benjamin is a smart guy I am sure he understands it. If another fork be created then both parties will loose. This could also be said to Fuse4X. The discussion about which one was first, > OSXFuse or Fuse4X could block this list for days. > What do you mean which one is the first? osxfuse just began its development while Fuse4X exists, fixes a bunch of compatibility issues, has a nice website http://fuse4x.org , used by many people, downloaded more than 2500 times. https://github.com/fuse4x/fuse4x/downloads > Is it a political reason? > > Actually, it was already argued about some days ago... no need to warm it > up if there are no new arguments. > For the opensource community good I think it worth discussing once again. I've still not heard any strong reason for yet-another-fork existence. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
