On 30 Jun, 2011, at 4:47 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I still don't understand the reason of creating yet another fork. There are > two forks already that claims itself as a MacFUSE successors: NuFS and Fuse4X.
NuFS is a commercial successor of MacFUSE and therefore out of this discussion. > Do we really need one more fork? This could also be said to Fuse4X. The discussion about which one was first, OSXFuse or Fuse4X could block this list for days. > Is it a political reason? Actually, it was already argued about some days ago... no need to warm it up if there are no new arguments. Regards, Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacFUSE" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macfuse?hl=en.
