Thanks Mike, Peter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 19:18:43 -0500, Mike Garton <jaztech at mac.com> wrote: > Digital film, unlike analog captures details very well in a sort of > brutal realism where images are not captured and recorded on film but > finer details(pixels). You want the best 'traditional" lens you can > afford, don't ever count on, or settle for, digital zoom unless you > have to, as the image gets really pixilated really fast. It looks like > that is exactly what you pay for in the difference in the cameras, a > better imaging system. The higher resolution will be nice when viewing > it on a LCD Display and if you foresee using this to make movies you > will watch on a TV that is LCD or plasma, where the pixels and digital > system are very good, you WILL notice a difference. The Lens in the > Optima is better as well as the CCD, or Charge-coupled device which > interprets and digests the image are a grade higher then the Elura but > the underlying recording and output systems are identical. The > difference between these cameras lie in two elements that directly > correlate to a much better image and clearer, crisper picture, and as > Nikon says: "When the picture matters, the camera matters." > > Mike > > On Feb 28, 2005, at 10:58 PM, Peter McGrath wrote: > > > Don, > > Yes, Mike certainly knows his stuff! > > His expertise in videography is evident. > > > > Hey Mike, any advice on camcorders? > > > > Got the point about the difference between iMovie and Final Cut, how > > important is it to get a high resolution camcorder? > > > > Refered by the "Ward of the Bard" to Murphy's, and to Canon, I > > searched the web for something of decent quality and as economical as > > possible. Somewhere between the Elura 65 and the Optima 40, I started > > leaning towards the Optima for the almost double resolution. > > > > What's important? What really matters? > > > > Pretty much decided on Final Cut Express as a necessary investment, > > are these choices, the Elura 65 or the Optima 40, reasonable? > > > > Peter McGrath > > eLogic Platinum > > > > > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:01:44 -0500, meredon3 at bellsouth.net > > <meredon3 at bellsouth.net> wrote: > >> Really enjoyed the demo of Final Cut that Mike presented at the last > >> meeting. Don't know about your > >> response, but I thought Mike did a great job. Hope the response was > >> good, because I would like him > >> back to show more tips on editing software. > >> > >> thanks, Don > >> > >> Don Meredith > >> > >> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will > >> | be February 22. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. > >> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> > >> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup> > >> > > > > > > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will > > | be March 22. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. > > | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> > > | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup> > > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will > | be March 22. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. > | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> > | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup> > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will | be March 22. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
