Justin Meek wrote:

>I too have this problem and would love it to be the other way around. I
>blows my mind that the default is not already having the new message at the
>top.
>
>  
>
With all the atrocities being committed with e-mail replies, I don't 
understand why this is such a problem. I believe all e-mail programs 
allow you the option to put your response before or after the original 
e-mail. So you have to make a change once. Big deal! I would imagine a 
reply to an e-mail would naturally follow the original e-mail and that's 
why the default is set the way it is.

I'm guessing this list is no different than any other list on the 
internet. Take a look at some of the letters that go back and forth. 
Maybe your line of thinking would be acceptable if an e-mail only had 
one question and one answer, but some of them have several responses. So 
you respond at the top, and I respond at the bottom and someone else 
disects each line of the e-mail and makes comments to each one. Then 
there's the ones that ask a different question, starting a new thread 
with the old Subject line. When you get four or more responses to the 
same e-mail, it's a jumbled mess no matter how you look at it. If 
anything should upset you, I think it should be something other than a 
default setting.

-- 
Tony LaFemina
When you want to do more than just buy software
http://hometown.aol.com/visitmacland/index.html
mailto:remacs at optonline.net




| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be September 23. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| This list's page is <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>.


Reply via email to