Hello all, Such is human nature. If things differ from the way we assume they should be we tend to think everyone doing it differently is stupid. Your point is valid; there is logic in replying at the bottom of the old email. Perhaps if there was a universally accepted default that would help avoid confusion, but that is not likely to happen. I like to have the newest reply at the top so I don't have to go searching for it or scroll down. I just find it more convenient and assumed (wrongly) that everyone else would feel the same way. Anyway, sorry for the presumption, but as for me I like to toss around both the very pressing and the not so pressing issues on this list. The freedom to throw out any old thing remotely Mac related appeals to me. > Hi Marta > > Basically, my response was to Justin's letter. He said his mind was > blown because it wasn't set the way he thought it should be. Sounds kind > of drastic (or dramatic maybe) for something so trivial. I just thought > there were more pressing e-mail issues to debate.
| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will | be September 23. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. | This list's page is <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>.
