George,
I run 10.2.8 on one machine and 10.3.9 on another. 10.3.9 is
noticeably better, imo. I especially like the archive function, built
into (or accessible through) the Finder and that Safari is a bit
evolved from the version that comes with 10.2.8. Also, Preview is a
much more useful application in 10.3.9 - faster and more featured, and
the Expos? feature is turning out to be handier than I expected. It's
actually worth learning about F9, F10 and F11 because of the ease it
adds to window management. I have not migrated my Mail to that version
of Mail, but if someone says it's substantially better, I'll shift.
Bill Holt
On Sunday, June 19, 2005, at 08:10 PM, George H.Yankey wrote:
> I am currently running Mac X 10.2.8 and having no problems. I have no
> interest in upgrading to Tiger; however, I am considering going to
> 10.3. Is this move worth the cost and trouble?
> I would appreciate any suggestions.
>
> George Yankey
>
>
>
> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
> | be July 26. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
>
| The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will
| be July 26. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>.
| List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu>
| List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
