Thanks Bill, I think I'll make the change. George On Sunday, June 19, 2005, at 11:10 PM, Bill Holt wrote:
> George, > > I run 10.2.8 on one machine and 10.3.9 on another. 10.3.9 is > noticeably better, imo. I especially like the archive function, built > into (or accessible through) the Finder and that Safari is a bit > evolved from the version that comes with 10.2.8. Also, Preview is a > much more useful application in 10.3.9 - faster and more featured, and > the Expos? feature is turning out to be handier than I expected. It's > actually worth learning about F9, F10 and F11 because of the ease it > adds to window management. I have not migrated my Mail to that > version of Mail, but if someone says it's substantially better, I'll > shift. > > Bill Holt > > On Sunday, June 19, 2005, at 08:10 PM, George H.Yankey wrote: > >> I am currently running Mac X 10.2.8 and having no problems. I have no >> interest in upgrading to Tiger; however, I am considering going to >> 10.3. Is this move worth the cost and trouble? >> I would appreciate any suggestions. >> >> George Yankey >> >> >> >> | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will >> | be July 26. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. >> | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> >> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup> >> > > > > > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will > | be July 26. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. > | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> > | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup> > | The next meeting of the Louisville Computer Society will | be July 26. The LCS Web page is <http://www.kymac.org>. | List posting address: <mailto:macgroup at erdos.math.louisville.edu> | List Web page: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup>
