Is this the definition of BIG DATA?  Thanks so much Lee, this is so interesting 
and accurate..

John



> On Jul 2, 2018, at 2:52 PM, Lee Larson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 2, 2018, at 12:11 PM, Bill Rising <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> Part of the difference could come from where she wears the fitbit. After 
>> some discussions in our family (back when there was a friendly competition 
>> about who could rack up the most steps), experimentation showed that many 
>> more steps got registered if the fitbit was on a sock/shoe than if it was 
>> near the waist, and near the waist registered more than near the neck.
> 
> 
> I suspect this is right. I have a pretty good Omron pedometer, designed to be 
> worn at waist level. It is basically an accelerometer that counts steps by 
> measuring the acceleration and deceleration as I walk or run. The Apple Watch 
> is on my wrist and I’m much more likely to shake my wrist around, adding 
> phantom steps.
> 
> I did an experiment this morning. The dog took me to Hays-Kennedy park and I 
> steadily walked on the track while counting my steps. I wore the following:
> 
> • Omron pedometer near my right hip clipped to the waistband of my shorts.
> • iPhone in my left pocket running the Pedometer++ app.
> • Apple Watch on my left wrist.
> • Garmin Vivofit on my right wrist.
> 
> Here are the results:
> 
> • 2578 = my count of the number of steps
> • 2564 = Omron                        (0.5% low)
> • 2607 = iPhone                       (1.1% high)
> • 2702 = Apple Watch          (6.6% high)
> • 2637 = Garmin                       (4.1% high)
> 
> It seems the ones near the hips are most accurate. 
> 
> L^2
> 
> PS/ Pedometer++ has the capability to average in the count from the Apple 
> Watch. I turned that off in its preferences.
> 
> PPS/ The Apple Watch may have been skewed because I was holding a very active 
> leash in my left hand most of the time.
> 
> ---
> ‌Lee Larson‌  [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>‌
> 
> ‌Alf Todd,’ said Ukridge, soaring to an impressive burst of imagery, ‘has 
> about as much chance as a one-armed blind man in a dark room trying to shove 
> a pound of melted butter into a wild-cat’s ear with a red-hot needle.’ ‌— P. 
> G. Wodehouse
> ‌Ukridge, 1924‌
> ‌
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MacGroup mailing list
> Posting address: [email protected]
> Archive: 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.mail-2Darchive.com_macgroup-40erdos.math.louisville.edu_&d=DwIFaQ&c=OAG1LQNACBDguGvBeNj18Swhr9TMTjS-x4O_KuapPgY&r=F2GFXrjLFqVo3VwvIlo_XYeEiRRjHv15rxcenz7A21woG2aFGcrzndoSsskxfmOs&m=MuF2qDSa8gL1aiWFRgaO8cKRsScXgx3pxrt38_dNCDA&s=b3SeYsdn4Hb8HyNDYzjlexg4mNyET8SV8A-hiwYqdAI&e=>
> Answers to questions: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup/>

_______________________________________________
MacGroup mailing list
Posting address: [email protected]
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
Answers to questions: <http://erdos.math.louisville.edu/macgroup/>

Reply via email to