Sami, could you file a ticket for us? Otherwise it will get lost. If
you have the SVN version, you can create a patch (even faster for us to
wire back into the project). Thanks for finding these (I assume you are
mentioning these because of the CF8 memory leak that Adobe isn't keen on
fixing:
http://cfbugs.adobe.com/cfbugreport/flexbugui/cfbugtracker/main.html#bugId=82362)
.pjf
Sami Hoda said the following on 27/04/10 18:47:
Peter,
You can include these changes for 1.81.
Using Regex to find missing output="false", I found a couple that
still haven't been patched.
File: \machII\filters\PermissionsFilter.cfc
<cffunction name="getUserPermissions" access="public"
returntype="any"
hint="Checks if user permissions is defined.">
<cffunction name="validatePermissions" access="public"
returntype="boolean"
hint="Validates if required permissions exists in the user's
permissions.">
Two functions missing "output".
File: \machII\framework\SubroutineManager.cfc
<cffunction name="getSubroutineHandler" access="public"
returntype="MachII.framework.SubroutineHandler"
hint="Returns the SubroutineHandler for the named Subroutine.
Checks
parent.">
Single function here.
There are also half a dozen in /tests. They can be found by using ^((?!
output).)*<cffunction((?!output).)*$ .
Sami
On Apr 5, 11:19 pm, "Peter J. Farrell"<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, there will be a 1.8.1 maintenance release. It's a milestone on
our roadmap. Here are the tickets in case you are interested:
http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/query?group=status&m...
We don't have an ETA for the release but I would say in the either the
end of this month or possibly in May. It really depends on if / when
people find any more edge case defects in 1.8.0. We will do a
maintenance release these days (although 1.6.1 was the first), so
expect to see 1.9.1 when Integrity (1.9.0) is released in the future.
Hope this answers your question.
.pjf
On Apr 5, 3:42 pm, jlcox<[email protected]> wrote:
I remember reading a couple weeks back about a possible point release
to 1.8. Is this something that is planned in the short term? The
reason that I ask is that upgrading the framework on our testing and
production servers involves some virtual paperwork, rounds of testing
and approval and intervention of serveral different groups. When Mach-
II 1.6 was released, I managed to shepard this entire process through
to production just in time to see 1.6.1 released.
I don't want to have the same thing happen again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to Mach-II for CFML list.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/mach-ii-for-coldfusion?hl=en
SVN: http://greatbiztoolsllc.svn.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/
Wiki / Documentation / Tickets:
http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/
