It seems the bug you linked to is marked closed. Odd. Looks like they really dont want to touch it.
I'll create a ticket. On Apr 27, 4:59 pm, "Peter J. Farrell" <[email protected]> wrote: > Sami, could you file a ticket for us? Otherwise it will get lost. If > you have the SVN version, you can create a patch (even faster for us to > wire back into the project). Thanks for finding these (I assume you are > mentioning these because of the CF8 memory leak that Adobe isn't keen on > fixing:http://cfbugs.adobe.com/cfbugreport/flexbugui/cfbugtracker/main.html#...) > > .pjf > > Sami Hoda said the following on 27/04/10 18:47: > > > > > Peter, > > > You can include these changes for 1.81. > > > Using Regex to find missing output="false", I found a couple that > > still haven't been patched. > > > File: \machII\filters\PermissionsFilter.cfc > > <cffunction name="getUserPermissions" access="public" > > returntype="any" > > hint="Checks if user permissions is defined."> > > <cffunction name="validatePermissions" access="public" > > returntype="boolean" > > hint="Validates if required permissions exists in the user's > > permissions."> > > > Two functions missing "output". > > > File: \machII\framework\SubroutineManager.cfc > > <cffunction name="getSubroutineHandler" access="public" > > returntype="MachII.framework.SubroutineHandler" > > hint="Returns the SubroutineHandler for the named Subroutine. > > Checks > > parent."> > > > Single function here. > > > There are also half a dozen in /tests. They can be found by using ^((?! > > output).)*<cffunction((?!output).)*$ . > > > Sami > > > On Apr 5, 11:19 pm, "Peter J. Farrell"<[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Yes, there will be a 1.8.1 maintenance release. It's a milestone on > >> our roadmap. Here are the tickets in case you are interested: > > >>http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/query?group=status&m... > > >> We don't have an ETA for the release but I would say in the either the > >> end of this month or possibly in May. It really depends on if / when > >> people find any more edge case defects in 1.8.0. We will do a > >> maintenance release these days (although 1.6.1 was the first), so > >> expect to see 1.9.1 when Integrity (1.9.0) is released in the future. > > >> Hope this answers your question. > > >> .pjf > > >> On Apr 5, 3:42 pm, jlcox<[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> I remember reading a couple weeks back about a possible point release > >>> to 1.8. Is this something that is planned in the short term? The > >>> reason that I ask is that upgrading the framework on our testing and > >>> production servers involves some virtual paperwork, rounds of testing > >>> and approval and intervention of serveral different groups. When Mach- > >>> II 1.6 was released, I managed to shepard this entire process through > >>> to production just in time to see 1.6.1 released. > > >>> I don't want to have the same thing happen again. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to Mach-II for CFML list. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/mach-ii-for-coldfusion?hl=en > SVN:http://greatbiztoolsllc.svn.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ > Wiki / Documentation / > Tickets:http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to Mach-II for CFML list. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mach-ii-for-coldfusion?hl=en SVN: http://greatbiztoolsllc.svn.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/ Wiki / Documentation / Tickets: http://greatbiztoolsllc.trac.cvsdude.com/mach-ii/
