On 11 Dec 2010, at 07:53, Levan, Jerry wrote: > bash-3.2# snmpwalk -c public router
I get these interesting entries in the snmpwalk output: RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.0.0.0.0 = INTEGER: 6 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.yy.yy.yy.0 = INTEGER: 7 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.yy.yy.yy.100 = INTEGER: 7 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.yy.yy.yy.101 = INTEGER: 7 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.yy.yy.yy.102 = INTEGER: 7 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.yy.yy.yy.103 = INTEGER: 7 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.yy.yy.yy.104 = INTEGER: 7 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.yy.yy.yy.255 = INTEGER: 7 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.127.0.0.0 = INTEGER: 3 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 3 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.127.0.0.2 = INTEGER: 3 RFC1213-MIB::ipRouteIfIndex.xx.xx.xx.xx = INTEGER: 6 Typically, the "0.0.0.0" route is the default route. Does anyone know if there is a connection between "ipRouteIfIndex" of 6 for the default route and 'ipRouteIfIndex" of xx.xx.xx.xx which is the external interface? If so, perhaps this method will be *correct* as opposed to the "pick the first entry from the list" method? Alex _______________________________________________ MacOSX-admin mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-admin
