Hi; I wonder if anybody has made a similar transition to what I'm thinking 
about…and if so was there any increase in overall throughput.

My wife and I live in an RV and are thus dependent on either wifi from the 
campground or our Verizon air card for external internet access. I can't really 
do anything about that but most of our usage is internally between our iPhone 
4's (not 4s), two original iPads, and two MBP (one Retina and one unibody)

My current network uses a WiFi Ranger as the router and this can't really be 
easily changed as it provides the ability to failover between wifi and the air 
card as required. The WiFi Ranger has 10/100 ethernet.

I currently have a 10/100 Linksys switch downstream of the WiFi Ranger and all 
internal devices are hooked up to it. These include an Intel Mac Mini (file 
server) with gigabit ethernet and an original Airport Extreme 802.11n First 
Generation that only has 10/100 ethernet connections. The Airport is in bridge 
mode with the router set as it's gateway. The two iPhone 4, two original iPads, 
and two MBPs all connect via the Airport which is set in 802.11n (802.11b/g 
compatible) mode.

I did a speed check for file transfer from one of the MBPs to the Mini and 
throughput is about 9.8 MB/sec…this compares pretty well with the 12.5 MB/sec 
maximum for a 10/100 switch; so clearly I'm being limited by the switches and 
not by the wifi throughput.

I'm considering replacing the existing Airport with the latest version which 
includes gigabit ethernet dual band (since the iPhones only do 2.4 GHz and I 
don't know whether the iPad 1's do 2.4 only or have 5 GHz as well)…along with 
this I would replace the switch with a gigabit switch. My thinking is that this 
would give us much better throughput between the MBPs and the server (Time 
Machine takes forever backing up to the Mini); obviously external connectivity 
won't be helped by this but that's fixed depending on how we're connecting at a 
particular parking spot.

I have a couple of questions about this. As a long time Mac Consultant I'm 
surprised that I never actually did this upgrade for any of my clients before 
we went on the road full time…but I didn't…I'm not adverse to spending money if 
it will help but would hate to spend 300 bucks upgrading only to find out it 
doesn't make any difference.

1. Am I likely to see significantly better throughput internally to our LAN if 
I make the above changes or am I just fighting physics?

2. Does the 10/100 router really make any difference for internal 
communications? I'm thinking no since all of the internal connections are via 
Bonjour anyway and since the gigabit switch that everything is connected to 
would handle all of the internal traffic, only going to the port connected to 
the router if it's an external internet request.

3. If my idea won't really give me any better service; is there anything else I 
can do to improve performance? I suppose I could switch the Airport to n only 
mode at 2.4 GHz but I don't think the b/g compatible mode really affects 
throughput, or does it? My wife also has a g only Dell box she uses for her 
part time job, but I can always turn on the g wifi in the WiFi Ranger and have 
two internal networks, the Airport for all of the Apple devices at n speed and 
the WiFi Ranger at g speed for the Windows machine.

4. If I do the dual wifi arrangement in 3 above; is there any way to keep all 
of my Apple devices from seeing the g network from the WiFI Ranger? The only 
way I can think of is to turn SSID broadcast off and then manually put the SSID 
of the network into the Dell instead of letting it automatically acquire.

Essentially what I'm trying to do is improve internal throughput for Time 
Machine backups and file opening/saving to the Mini file server; with the side 
benefit of making sure that all external internet traffic is limited by the 
external link connection speed and not by anything internal to my LAN. The 
10/100 in the WiFi Ranger is clearly enough to keep up with anything on the 
internet end I might be connected to.

Thanks for any suggestions you can offer.


_______________________________________________
MacOSX-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk

Reply via email to