On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 01:56:32PM -0700, Larry Shatzer wrote:
>
> On Monday, June 11, 2001, at 01:41 PM, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > Hmm, I wonder why no other gccs seem to care? What's the version of
> > gcc?
>
> Reading specs from /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/2.95.2/specs
> Apple Computer, Inc. version gcc-926, based on gcc version 2.95.2
> 19991024 (release)
>
> Maybe Apple mucked with something?
Another possibility is that that said constants are somehow brokenly
defined in Mac OS X. Running the util.c through gcc -E -I. would tell
us more.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
