Well mostly it doesn't seem to make any sense to use Apache::Cookie without Apache::Request
Using Apache::Request by itself is pretty good. There are some example files in the libapreq src directory. so the best place to derive some tests is from there. ---------------------------------------------- Scott, if you have a look through the archives of this list you will see quite a saga dealing with mod_perl. most of the activity seems to occur around the same time as John's "quarterly" requests to the list on the subject. Which I guess means he is on his 4th quarter by now though I don't think this list has been here as long as that. ---------------------------- About compiling perl there is very excellent information here as well. most of the original posts from time of the Public Beta to Release of 10.0. In summary it is the HFS lack of case awareness problem so you either have to change the configuration for first makefile or move your CPAN build area to UFS. ---------------------------- On Thursday, October 25, 2001, at 09:04 AM, Ken Williams wrote: > > > Scott Anguish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 08:58 PM, John Siracusa wrote: >>>> The httpd comes up just fine and a couple of little test scripts >>>> using both modules seem to run just fine for me. >>> >>> Okay, so can you post the exact steps, from totally blank HD to >>> working mod_perl apache server with Apache::Request and >>> Apache::Cookie loaded and functioning correctly? >>> >> >> I'd love to put that up on Stepwise (well, the additions for >> mod_perl) > > Scott - > > I have yet to find anyone who *actually* has Apache::Request and > Apache::Cookie running properly, including the people on this list. > Several people /think/ they've got it working, though. > > The problem is that libapreq doesn't define any tests, so it /looks/ > like it compiles and installs fine, but in fact when you try to use the > modules together, linker errors ensue. > > -Ken > If anybody does have a working compile, please feel free to make arrangement with me to send it and I can post it here on http so everyone can peruse it. I suppose it doesn't have to be everything... like the config.status from apache and resulting Makefiles from mod-perl, config.h and config.pm from perl. One thing is sure...as John is rightfully getting upset about, MacOSX "needs" to run these normal software for webserving. Especially to gain wide acceptance in the industry. And on a personal level I am not looking forward to developing the linux machines if these things refuse to work. Even the small sample file_upload.pl which only uses Apache::Request was pretty snappy. On Thu Oct 25, 2001, Hardi Bales-Stutes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would suspect that this could be fixed with the whole two level name > space thing that Apple uses but that's over my head. I'm just a lowly > perl jockey. > C in all its various incarnations gives me a headache. it has been a thought.. I have been trying to understand more fully the ld man page. I keep thinking there is something obvious... maybe soon.... Jim --------------------------------------------------------------------------- reply directly to: Jim Cooper mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] iMedia, Ltd. Tokyo http://www.ai-media.co.jp ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
